Brighton v Everton - Home
Liverpool v Ipswich Town - Home
Southhamption v Newcastle - Away
Wolves v Arsenal - Away
Bournemouth v Nottingham Forest - Draw
Man City v Chelsea - Draw
Tottenham v Leicester City - Home
Crystal Palace v Brentford - Home
Aston Villa v West Ham - Home
Fulham v Manchester United - Draw
Last week I had five right. Still wobbling along at 49% for the season to date.
Reporting share price movements in general news bulletins on television or radio is pointless and meaningless.
The majority of viewers and listeners don’t give a toss about individual share prices. But they are not the target audience. Actually, it’s hard to figure out who is the target audience.
The information given in a quick bulletin is of little use to those who do care. Nobody in their right mind is going to run out and buy or sell shares if the reporter says “Company X is down two cents at $2.12”.
A share owner will want to check this information before acting. They have apps and other information sources to help them.
Share trading professionals will have immediate access to better and fuller information. Even keen amateur traders will want more than a raw price.
So why do news bulletins broadcast this information?
It could be filler. Some TV bulletins flick up the numbers on the way into or out of commercial breaks. Lord knows New Zealand broadcasters sometimes struggle to fill their long news bulletins with enough worthwhile material.
Reporting share price movements also sends an important signal to audiences that the broadcasters are aware of business news and determined to take it seriously. But that’s it. A form of virtue signalling or marketing, not the dissemination of information.
One of the great things about Micro.Blog is you can use it for quick social-media style thoughts or you can write a more expansive blog post.
Good blog posts communicate ideas and information. Do it with crisp, unambiguous writing.
There’s nothing wrong with flowery writing. Just leave it for poetry, song lyrics and literary fiction.
Here are seven steps to help you turn out snappy blog posts that’ll have readers coming back for more:
Get straight to the point. Set out your store in the opening paragraph. Tell readers what the rest of the story will be about. If you’ve got one, make the first paragraph your opening argument.
Prove it. Follow your opening paragraph by building on the first idea or argument. Provide back-up information to explain or support the first paragraph. Tell readers why you said what you did in that first paragraph.
Make extra points in descending order of importance. Readers can drop out at any point. Make sure they get the best points early while you still have their attention.
Use plenty of full stops and line breaks. Short sentences make your copy dynamic and fast-moving. Short paragraphs make text easier to read. This is more important online. As a bonus, tight copy helps you articulate your ideas.
Murder your darlings. If you think you’ve written something clever, chances are you haven’t. Hit the delete key and move on. Don’t use favourite obscure words or complicated metaphors. Anything that sounds like poetry needs cutting, unless you are writing poetry.
Get on, get off, don’t hang around. And don’t outstay your welcome. Don’t feel the need for a long wrap-up. Make your last point, summarise if it helps, then stop writing.
Check before hitting the send button. Read through your post, spell-check, look for poor grammar, weed out the needless words, make sure the text is understandable. I sometimes walk away from the screen and do something else before returning for one last read. The distance helps.
Rules number four and five in Writing for the web in 300 words say:
Learn grammar. Forget what teachers said about long words making you look smart. It isn’t true. Instead use simple words, grammar and sentences. It is harder to go wrong.
Finding simple words isn’t always easy, especially when you are in a hurry.
A thesaurus helps. There are online thesauri and there are two paper ones on my bookshelf at home. There’s a thesaurus built into MacOS.
And then there is Ironic Sans’ Thsrs.
Thsrs is a short word thesaurus designed to help social users find shorter words to fit in tight character limits. Thsrs is a great tool for digging out a simpler, easier-to-read alternative, option, choice.
You may call it a blog post, article or something else. A journalist would call it a story. Here’s how to write a good one.
Start your story by telling the reader what it is about. You do this briefly in the headline. Then again in the introduction or intro, which is a stop press paragraph.
Ask yourself:
Sum up the story in your mind in one simple sentence. This is your intro.
Its job is to tell the reader what the article is about and draw the reader in. As a rule, readers prefer brief intros.
Write so a reader who only gets as far as your intro still has a basic grasp of your story.
Newspapers teach journalists to start with a single sentence of between 15 and 21 words. This is what you should aim for, although at times you’ll need to use more words.
As an aside, proper nouns made up of multiple words only count as a single word when you’re calculating the ideal intro length.
You can have one sentence in your first paragraph or two or three. Either way keep it short and crisp.
Next comes the how — how did it happen or, more usually in your case, what happens next?
This is background information or explanation.
After the explanation comes amplification. You amplify the point or points following on from the intro.
Make these points one by one and in descending order of importance.
Last, after making all the main points, tie up any loose ends — ie., add any extra or background information deemed necessary but of lesser importance.
Elmore Leonard wrote this as the last of his ten rules of writing.
If it sounds like writing, rewrite it
Leonard is an author. A first-rate author who writes fast-paced novels with great dialogue and plenty of action.
While Leonard is an artist, his advice applies to journalists and anyone else who writes for a living.
What he means is make sure your writing doesn’t sound like an undergraduate essay or a high school homework.
Some of the stories on my other site (https://billbennett.co.nz) are so old that companies still had managing directors.
I swear the TradeMe sales experience is worse now than when I last sold things five or six years ago.
There is a useful post at the Columbia Journalism Review chewing over the difference between words like electric and electrical or historic and historical.
There are people who swear by ChatGPT, but I only ever get rubbish when I test the service.
Today I asked it what it thought of my Premier League match prediction that Manchester City would beat Ipswich and I got this gem:
“Ipswich is not currently in the Premier League; they play in the Championship. You might want to double-check this fixture as it seems misplaced.”
For those who don’t know, it’s been around eight months since Ipswich was promoted.
I continually test ChatGPT by asking about things I know really well. On balance it is wrong more often than it is right. The disturbing thing is that people are using tools like this to make business decisions.
Newcastle v AFC Bournemouth - Home
Brentford v Liverpool - Home
Leicester v Fulham - Away
West Ham v Crystal Palace - Draw
Arsenal v Aston Villa - Home
Everton v Spurs - Draw
Man United v Brighton - Draw
Notts Forest v Southampton - Home
Ipswich v Man City - Away
Chelsea v Wolves - Home
I haven’t published predictions since the Boxing Day fixtures where I got 5 out of 10 correct. So far this season I’m running at 49 percent correct, which is way below previous years.
Modern newspaper style books tell journalists to use among rather than amongst. The rule applies on both sides of the Atlantic as well as in Australia and New Zealand.
While both words are correct, amongst is regarded as old-fashioned and may soon be obsolete. At least one newspaper style book describes it as archaic.
My 50-year-old printed copy of the Oxford Concise Dictionary offers the two words as alternatives.
According to the Oxford Dictionaries website, among is “chiefly British”. This surprised me.
Years ago, when training journalists, I would joke that Americans use more commas than British journalists because they are rich and can afford the extra ink. The same applies to journalists in Ireland, Australia or New Zealand.
You would often find long, comma-packed sentences in American newspapers. They don’t make for easy reading.
It’s better to write using plenty of full stops instead — periods if you’re American — and go sparing on the comma.
Keeping track of who does what to whom is hard in long, comma-laden sentences. Breaking sentences into smaller units of meaning makes writing easier to follow.
Only use commas where they aid understanding.
Writers often underrate the comma’s use as an aid to sense.
Some Americans put commas between all clauses and sub-clauses. Som grammar checking software tells you to do the same.
British-trained writers avoid them between short clauses at the start of sentences.
Americans also use commas before and at the end of a list of items. This is sometimes called the Oxford comma. As the name suggests, this is an not exclusively American habit.
Argument in favour of the Oxford comma seems to be gaining ground in some circles. That’s partly because writers who favour the Oxford comma have trained us to read prose the way we might read a formal logic argument.
Some experts say Americans are moving towards British patterns and commas are now less common on both sides of the Atlantic. Let’s hope so.
One last point. Neither approach is right or wrong. How one uses commas and full stops is a matter of editorial style, not grammar. The important thing about style is to be consistent.
I can’t be the only person who is disappointed by an ugly, rich South African’s smug face constantly showing up in my feed.
Can someone invent a filter for images?
Quotes are important in journalism and reporting because they tell readers the information in question wasn’t made up by a reporter, but is someone’s account or opinion.
Not all quotes are equal. The best come directly from an interviewee’s speech and are faithfully reproduced. In electronic media these are obvious – you see or hear the person in question saying their own words.
With written media, quotes can be either direct or indirect.
Direct quotes are written inside speech marks and are more or less exactly the interviewee’s words.
I say “more or less exactly” because many journalists, myself included, tidy up, taking out the hesitations, the ums and the ahs. This is perfectly OK. What isn’t acceptable is putting words in someone’s mouth – words they didn’t use.
It would be normal to correct the grammar up to a point.
We often edit – often the reader only sees part of an interview. It wouldn’t be practical to include every word.
Journalists use indirect quotes to simplify and summarise an interviewee’s words, they improve readability.
Most quotes you see in written media come from interviews. Some come from prepared statements.
Organisations use prepared statements to control their message rather than answering pesky questions from nosey journalists whose job is to extract the truth not parrot propaganda.
Prepared statements generally don’t read like human speech. For some reason people think robotic English makes them sound more sincere or knowledgeable. Often the reverse is true.
Journalists don’t always make it clear when they repeat a prepared statement. This isn’t dishonesty. It happens because constantly telling readers where information comes from all the time quickly gets boring. We come from a tradition where the column inches allocated to a story was limited. And we still work in a market where readers lose patience with too much detail.
On the other hand, journalists shouldn’t pull the wool over reader’s eyes.
I tell my readers when a quote is from a statement when I’m writing a news story or feature, but not if I’m writing a two paragraph snippet. Most of the time I also tell readers if a quote is from an emailed response – which may have been written by committee or a social media post.
There’s a fine line between full disclosure and boring readers. But if the story is controversial or important, it is best to take the risk and be candid.
Given that the moment you throw one out, a device turns up that can only use the now missing proprietary cable, how many cables should you hoard?
Your job as a writer is to get your message across clearly and quickly.
One way you can sabotage communication is by laying traps for readers. Traps that halt a reader’s natural flow as their eye scans over text.
Punctuation – as the name suggests – stops flow. This is why I leave out optional commas.
You can also slow down a reader’s flow when you use capital letters incorrectly. For the same reason you should never write a word entirely in capitals.
Companies that insist their names are spelled out in capitals only do this because they want to halt the reader’s flow and make them take notice. You do not have to indulge them. It’s another story if they are paying you to write marketing copy.
Likewise I don’t use the ‘&’ symbol – instead I always write ‘and’. The exception to this rule is when the ‘&’ forms part of a company’s name.
The same applies to ‘+’.
It is also better to write out percent in full than use %. Although some newspapers, including one where I work, insists on using the symbol.
Never resort to phone text-style language in anything written for a wider audience. It isn’t funny, clever or useful.
Got a GST reminder from Inland Revenue last night for my biggest tax period of the year. Worried all night that I hadn’t paid quite a large tax bill, was concerned about the money and resigned myself to an hour or two with Xero fixing things this morning. Turns out the reminder was incorrect.
The good thing about reading the football news pages first is that the stories are never triggering: unless you happen to be a Spurs or Everton fan.
Over the summer I’ve been fixing the broken links on my other website. There are close to 2000 pages on the site and by the end of November there were around the same number of broken links.
Links break when sites go offline or move pages from one URL to another without a redirect. This is sometimes known as link rot. It has become far more common in recent years. Some weeks the service I use to flag broken links shows as many as dozen either vanish or move. The most I noticed in a single week was 28.
Fixing broken links is tedious and time consuming. Some I just let go and delete the link. OK, I let a lot of them go. If they are easy to repair, I’ll rewrite the link.
So far this summer I’ve repaired or trashed, mainly trashed, about 1400 broken links. The downside of doing this is that twice I have accidentally hit the wrong button and republished the page with the broken link.
My newsletter readers might be wondering what is going on.
Avoid jargon if you can. Sometimes you have no choice.
It makes your writing difficult to understand and puts readers off. Jargon confuses readers and in many cases jargon is ambiguous – always a sign of poor communication. It puts a barrier between you and your readers.
This is especially hard if you interview someone who talks in jargon and mangement cliches. You have a duty to report their words accurately, but you also have a duty not to bombard readers with gobbledegook.
Where you can, turn quotes into indirect speech and simply drop the jargon term. Use easily understood descriptive words and phrases instead.
When you can’t avoid a jargon term give your reader a short definition in plain English.
If possible add an example to illustrate the definition.
I had to write about management when the term ‘participative management’ came up as unavoidable jargon.
I explained this as:
Participative management, a way of running things where the workers take part in decision-making.
It would have been so much better if the interviewee said that in the first place.
The post is ancient, but Erin Brenner wonders “Does spelling still matter?”
It does. It matters a lot.
Some people think worrying about spelling and grammar is anal and backward. They are wrong.
There are two reasons why spelling and grammar are important and will remain important for as long as people still read printed words:
First: Well-written, properly-spelt, grammatically-correct English is unambiguous.
Poorly written English is open to misinterpretation.
If being understood is important, then worry about spelling and grammar.
Second: Well-written text flows, it’s a pleasure to read. It sends readers a message about your professionalism and wisdom. It is credible. People want to read more of it.
Poorly written English jerks around, it causes readers to stumble. They may not realise why this sets off alarm bells in their heads, but it does. They won’t look for follow-up reading.
Too much poor English and they’ll question the message. This may not happen on a conscious level. It may not happen with all readers. It will happen enough for it to matter. So yes, spelling still matters.